Experience in monitoring the educational activities of students

DOI: 10.31673/2518-7678.2021.017582

Authors

  • О. П. Бесклінська, (Besklinsʹka O. P.) Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv
  • Т. Б. Гордієнко, (Hordiyenko T. B.) State University of Telecommunications, Kyiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31673/2518-7678.2021.017582

Abstract

Today, digital technologies allow creating and operated a virtual (online) platform that facilitates synchronous and asynchronous interaction with available resources between all parties to the learning process. In distance or blended learning, students independently organize, control, direct and regulate their activities. At the same time, monitoring, in particular by the teacher, plays a crucial role in creating internal feedback and, thus, in adopting appropriate rules. However, students may have unsatisfactory self-regulated learning outcomes due to poor monitoring. Therefore, external feedback between all actors involved in the various electronic learning management platforms is important. The article analyzes the possibilities of monitoring the educational activities of students in the study of disciplines in the system of higher education for technical and economic specialties. The main components of the study and the possibility of obtaining information about the activity and success of student learning in the learning management systems Moodle and Microsoft Teams are considered. A detailed description of obtaining information about the student's actions on the page of the discipline in the Moodle system using the blocks "Action Reports" and "Monitoring" are presented. Opportunities for monitoring all active student groups with which the teacher works, using the Insights tab and other Microsoft Teams applications are presented. The mechanisms of obtaining statistical information about the work of students during classroom and extracurricular work are described.

Keywords: analytics, monitoring of educational activities, Moodle, Microsoft Teams, Insights.

References
1. Т. Коваль, А. Аврамчук. Використання системи MOODLE для створення мультимедійних електронних освітніх ресурсів з мовних дисциплін: зарубіжний і вітчизняний досвід // Педагогічний процес: теорія і практика (Серія: Педагогіка). – 2016. – № 2 (53). – С. 93-99.
2. Zahorulko S., Petrenko S. Peculiarities of testing application to assess the acquired knowledge via SMART-technology implemented in the modern foreign languages teaching // The scientific heritage. – 2020. – 47. – P. 12-16.
3. Шкляр В. М. ІКТ – освіта без кордонів. модернізація освіти в умовах інформатизації суспільства // Scientific Journal “ScienceRise”. – 2016. – № 1/5 (18). – С. 42-47.
4. Шахіна Ю. І., Ільїна О. І. Організація контролю якості знань студентів із використанням електронного тестування // Фізико-математична освіта: науковий журнал. – 2016. – Випуск 4 (10). – С. 152-157.
5. Пацкова Т. В., Бойко Т. В., Бендюг В. І. Аспекти застосування інформаційно-комунікаційних технологій у вищій освіті // Східно-Європейський журнал передових технологій. – 2010. – № 2/10 (44). – С. 65-70.
6. P. Fidalgo, J. Thormann, O. Kulyk, J.-A. Lencastre. Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. – 2020. – V. 17, 18.
7. Watts, L. Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning: A review of the literature. Quarterly Review of Distance Education. – 2016. – 17(1). – P. 23–32.
8. Garrison, D. R. Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. – 2000. – 1(1). – P. 1–17.
9. Garrison, D. R., Kanuka, H. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. – 2004. – 7(2). P. 95–105.
10. Tseng, H., Walsh Jr. Blended versus traditional course delivery: Comparing students’ motivation, learning outcomes, and preferences // The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. – 2016. – 17(1). P. 43–52.
11. De Paepe, L., Zhu, C., Depryck, K. Online Dutch L2 learning in adult education: Educators’ and providers’ viewpoints on needs, advantages and disadvantages // Open Learning. – 2018. – 33 (1). – P. 18–33.
12. Lei, S. A., Gupta, R. K. College distance education courses: Evaluating benefits and costs from institutional, faculty and students’ perspectives // Education. – 2010. – 130(4). – P. 616–631.
13. Dobbs, R., del Carmen, A., Waid-Lindberg, C. Students’ perceptions of online courses: The effect of online course experience // The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. – 2017. – 18(1). – P. 98–109.

Published

2022-07-05

Issue

Section

Articles