EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT MARKET OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES: BEST PRACTICES AND EXPERIENCES FOR UKRAINE

DOI: 10.31673/2786-7412.2024.034963

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the effectiveness of the state
executive service, which even now causes a number of complaints, the reason for
which is the low effectiveness of work ᴨᴏ the implementation of decisions
The positioning of our countryʼs European integration intentions requires
the implementation of real steps in the direction of bringing the domestic system
of public administration closer to the standards of the European community. The
sphere of execution of court decisions, which needs significant modernization, is
no exception. The need for reform is determined by the fact that the existing system
of executive proceedings in Ukraine is internally contradictory, underdeveloped,
incomplete, and disconnected from the people.
The modern experience of the functioning of the executive service institute
in civil society and, accordingly, the system of public administration of foreign
countries is summarized, and the possibilities of its application in the process of
reforming the executive service of Ukraine are outlined.
Taking into account the characteristic signs and forms of redistribution of
power and the sphere of enforcement of decisions, it is worth distinguishing centralized and decentralized systems of executive proceedings. When comparing
the effectiveness of centralized and decentralized systems of executive proceedings
that are used in the world, it should be noted that the most effective are those that
function in countries where the population is characterized by respect for the law,
a high level of legal culture, etc.

References
1. Kuzmina, I.S. ( 2015). Foreign experience in building executive systems:
comparative characteristics and prospects for application in Ukraine.
Bulletin of Zaporizhzhya National University, 1, 139–145.
2. Makushev, P.V. ( 2014). International experience of legal regulation of
activities of representatives of state bodies in executive proceedings.
Almanac of international law, 6, 33–40
3. Marchenko, M.G., Shmatko, E.V. (2016). Innovations of executive
proceedings in Ukraine. A young scientist, 4 (31), 624–628.
4. Law of Ukraine (March 18, 2004). About the National Program for the
Adaptation of the Legislation of Ukraine to the Legislation of the European
Union: № 1629-IV. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 29, Art.
367.
5. Severin, D.V. (2014). Foreign experience of bodies exercising powers
related to the execution of court decisions and its adaptation to the domestic
legal system. European perspectives, 3, 81–87.
6. Surai, I.G. (2019). Democratic governance: values and competences.
Bulletin of the National Academy of Public Administration under the
President of Ukraine, 2, 71–76.
7. Teremecki, V.I., Krupnova, L.V. (2016). Application of foreign experience
in the field of execution of jurisdictional decisions in Ukraine. Judicial
appeal, 4(45), 38–45.
8. Fiolevskyi, D.P., Lobantsev, S.Yu., Mezyentsev, E.I. (2004). State
executive service in Ukraine: training. Manual. Kyiv: Alerta, 564 p.
9. Shandruk, C. (2010). Systems of enforcement of court decisions. World
experience. Democratic governance, 5. Аvailable at:
http://lvivacademy.com/ vidavnitstvo_1/visnik5/fail/+Shandruk.