MAJOR TRENDS OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL REVOLUTION AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE TRANSFORMATION OF INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION POLICY

DOI: 10.31673/2786-7412.2025.031603

Authors

  • А. Любченко, (A. Lyubchenko) State University of Information and Communication Technologies, Kyiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31673/2786-7412.2025.031603

Keywords:

public administration, digital practices, globalization, international information, information and communication technologies

Abstract

The development of new technologies greatly facilitates the process of
dynamic transformation within the international system. The subject of international
information, as well as its goals and operational areas, are subject to the
multidimensional influence of technological factors. Technological progress leads to the
redistribution of information in the international environment, contributes to a change in
its structure, forms connections between key participants in international relations, is a
source of increasing the range, intensity and effectiveness of cross-border actions. The
information revolution is the basis of the «infrastructure of globalization», thus
influencing the dynamics of processes that lead to changes in the main parameters of the
international environment. Information and communication technologies are a unique
type of technology that, unlike traditional industrial technologies, not only provides new
methods of production of goods, but also entails important systemic changes in the social,
economic and political spheres, including on an international scale. This article focuses
on the analysis of both current trends in the technological transformation of the means of
generating, collecting, processing and storing international information, and the
consequences of their application in a globalizing world.
Global information and communication technologies have greatly facilitated
international communication, trade and cultural exchange. In the modern world, it is not
difficult to communicate and share ideas. Global information social networks unite
people around the world. They quickly disseminate information and make the world more
transparent. However, these networks are becoming a tool for powerful influence on
national and international politics. The relationship between globalization and global
information and communication technologies creates both opportunities and challenges,
with the potential to bridge or widen the gap in global access to resources, knowledge
and services. However, they act as a «double-edged sword». In the future, they can both
contribute to the progress of humanity and lead to global catastrophes. Therefore, it is
important to implement technical innovations responsibly, balancing technological
advances with ethical considerations.

References
1. Toynbee, A. (1995). A Study of History (Vol. 1). Kyiv: Osnovy.
2. Foucault, M. (2003). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Kyiv: Osnovy.
3. Giddens, A. (2004). Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives.
Kyiv: Alterpress.
4. Fukuyama, F. (2006). The End of History and the Last Man. Simon & Schuster.
5. Brzezinski, Z. (2019). The Grand Chessboard. Kyiv: Fabula.
6. Huntington, S. P. (2006). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World
Order. Lviv: Kalvariia.
7. Pakhomov, Yu. M. (Ed.). (2006). The Civilizational Structure of the Modern
World (Vol. 1: Global Transformations of Modernity). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
8. Shepelev, M. A. (2004). Globalization of Governance as a Megatrend of
Contemporary World Development: A Monograph. Kyiv: Geneza.
9. Makarenko, Ye. A. (2002). International Information Relations: A Monograph.
Kyiv: Nasha Kultura i Nauka.
10. Pocheptsov, H. H., & Chukut, S. A. (2008). Information Policy: A Monograph.
Kyiv: Znannia.
11. Bodnar, I. (2013). Modern Realities of the Information Society: Problems of
Formation and Prospects for Development. Lviv: LKA Publishing House.
12. Bińczyk, E., Derra, A., & Grygieńć, J. (Eds.). (2015). Horyzonty
konstruktywizmu: inspiracje, perspektywy, przyszłość. Toruń: Nicolaus
Copernicus University Press.
13. Latour, B. (2013). An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the
Moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Castells, M., & Cardoso, G. (Eds.). (2005). The Network Society: From
Knowledge to Policy. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic
Relations.
15. Böhme, G. (2012). Invasive Technification: Critical Essays in the Philosophy of
Technology. Continuum / A&C Black.
16. Mogensen, K. (2017). From public relations to corporate public diplomacy. Public
Relations Review, 43(3), 605–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.011
17. Singh, J. P. (2015). The power of diplomacy: New meanings and the methods for
understanding digital diplomacy. In Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice (pp.
181–198). London–New York: Routledge.
18. Snow, N., & Taylor, P. M. (2008). Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy.
New York: Routledge.
19. Sprawl trilogy. (n.d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprawl_trilogy
20. Ragnedda, M., & Muschert, G. W. (2013). The Digital Divide: The Internet and
Social Inequality in International Perspective. London: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069769.
21. McCarthy, J. (n.d.). Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from
http://jmc.stanford.edu/artificial-intelligence/index.html.

Published

2025-11-05

Issue

Section

Articles