ACCESS MANAGEMENT IN DIGITAL ECOSYSTEMS AS AN ELEMENT OF THE ANTI-CRISIS STRATEGY OF ENTERPRISE

Abstract

The article substantiates the theoretical, methodological, and practical foundations of forming an
anti-crisis strategy for enterprises operating within digital ecosystems. The leading trends in the
development of ecosystem entrepreneurship under conditions of large-scale digitalization are
identified, including business platformization, co-opetition, and technological hyper-integration,
which cause the erosion of the classical network perimeter and the emergence of permeable interorganizational boundaries.
The essence of anti-crisis management transformation is investigated, shifting from the isolated
protection of an individual economic entity to ensuring the collective resilience of the entire partner
network. The author's architecture of the anti-crisis strategy is developed, integrating sequential
functional stages of response (contours of economic security, platform technology stack, network
interaction, and socio-ethical contour) with radial closure of all processes on a single coordination
center — the core of dynamic access management.
The feasibility of deploying this core based on the Zero Trust Architecture with the application of
continuous adaptive user rights assessment mechanisms based on security event signals and realtime contextual session management is proven. The strategic role of access management as a
fundamental coordination lever ensuring deep resource microsegmentation, the legitimacy of interorganizational transactions, and the general economic security of enterprises in a turbulent digital
environment is defined.
Keywords: access management, digital ecosystem, ecosystem entrepreneurship, anti-crisis
strategy, Zero Trust, economic security, platformization, co-opetition, resilience

References
1. Korobeinikova, T. I., & Kravchenko, O. V. (2024). Kontseptsiia nulovoi doviry: suchasni
metody zabezpechennia kiberbezpeky korporatyvnykh merezh [The zero trust concept: Modern methods of ensuring cybersecurity of corporate networks]. Visnyk Lvivskoho Derzhavnoho
Universytetu Bezpeky Zhyttiediyalnosti, (30), 156–165. URL:
https://journal.ldubgd.edu.ua/index.php/Visnuk/article/view/2769
2. Kapeliushna, T., & Prymachenko, D. (2025). Mechanism for Managing Access to Information
Resources at an Enterprise. Kiberbezpeka: Osvita, Nauka, Tekhnika, 3(27), 171–183. URL:
https://www.csecurity.kubg.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/download/743/609
3. Mankivskyi, B. (2025). Doslidzhennia mozhlyvosti realizatsii kontseptsii Zero Trust v
ekosystemakh Internetu rechei [Researching the possibility of implementing the Zero Trust concept
in Internet of Things ecosystems]. Kiberbezpeka: Osvita, Nauka, Tekhnika, (2), 89–101.
URL:https://www.csecurity.kubg.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/864
4. Horodytskyi, O., & Opirskyi, I. (2025). Pokrokovyi pidkhid do implimentatsii Zero Trust u
hibrydnykh arkhitekturakh korporatyvnoi bezpeky [A step-by-step approach to the implementation
of Zero Trust in hybrid enterprise security architectures]. Kiberbezpeka: Osvita, Nauka, Tekhnika,
3(31), 38–54. URL: https://www.csecurity.kubg.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/864
5. Skladannyi, P. M. (2026). Bezperervna otsinka dostupu v Zero Trust Access Management na
osnovi podiievykh syhnaliv bezpeky ta dynamichnoho keruvannia sesiiamy [Continuous access
evaluation in Zero Trust Access Management based on event-driven security signals and dynamic
session management]. Matematychni Mashyny i Systemy, (1), 5–18. URL:
https://www.immsp.kiev.ua/publications/articles/2026/2026_1/01_26_Skladannyi.pdf
6. Kyriakidou, C. D. N., Papathanasiou, A. M., Siris, V. A., & Fotiou, N. (2025). Identity and
access management for the computing continuum (pp. 1–16). URL:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09559
7. Singh, A. P., Kuzminykh, I., & Ghita, B. (2024). Industry perception of security challenges
with identity access management solutions (pp. 1–20). URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10634
8. Sahaidak, M. (2025). Platformni biznes-ekosystemy ta modeli upravlinnia dostupom do
danykh [Platform business ecosystems and data access management models]. Ekonomika ta
Suspilstvo, (35), 44–55 URL:
https://journal.eae.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/download/599/450
9. Horban, S. (2025). Biznes-ekosystemy v Ukraini: stratehichni napriamy rozvytku v umovakh
tsyfryzatsii [Business ecosystems in Ukraine: Strategic development directions in the context of
digitalization]. Scientific Development and Education, (8), 77–91 URL: https://www.euscientists.com/index.php/sdel/article/download/173/167
10. Odnoshevna, O. O., Minkovska, A. V., & Savanchuk, T. M. (2023). Antykryzove upravlinnia
yak element udoskonalennia systemy ekonomichnoi bezpeky v suchasnykh umovakh [Crisis
management as an element of improving the economic security system in modern conditions].
Ekonomika ta Suspilstvo, (49), 55–60. URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-49-9
11. Horbanova, V. O. (2024). Tsyfrova ekosistema yak osnovnyi element kliientooriientovanoi
stratehii upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom [Digital ecosystem as a fundamental element of customeroriented strategy of enterprise management]. Pidpryiemnytstvo ta Innovatsii, (31), 31–36. URL: DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-3583/31.5.
12. Rybalko-Rak, L. A., Husakovska, T. O., & Opryshko, V. I. (2025). Tsyfryzatsiia ta
antykryzove upravlinnia: stratehichni zminy dlia rozvytku konkurentospromozhnoi ekosystemy
[Digitalization and crisis management: Strategic changes for the development of a competitive
ecosystem]. Problemy Ekonomiky, 1(63), 223–229. URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-
2025-1-223-229
13. Laptiev, M., Laptiev, S., & Zakharov, O. (2025). Stratehii antykryzovoho upravlinnia
ukrainskymy pidpryiemstvamy v umovakh pisliavoiennoi transformatsii ekonomiky [Strategies of
crisis management of Ukrainian enterprises in the conditions of post-war economic transformation].
Vcheni Zapysky Universytetu KROK, 2(78), 193–202. URL: https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-
2025-78-193-202.
14. Prib, K. A. (2024). Antykryzovi stratehii v upravlinni pidpryiemstvamy [Crisis strategies in
enterprise management]. Ekonomika ta Suspilstvo, (70), 661–667. URL: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-70-116.
15. Leendertse, J., Schrijvers, M., & Stam, E. (2022). Measure twice, cut once: Entrepreneurial
ecosystem metrics. Research Policy, 51(9), Article 104336 URL:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104336.
16. Audretsch, D., Cruz, M., & Torres, J. (2022). Revisiting Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. World
Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (10229). URL: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-10229.
17. Sahaidak, M. P., & Biletskyi, Ya. O. (2024). Upravlinnia biznes-ekosystemoi v umovakh
novoi normalnosti ta transtsendentnosti [Business ecosystem management under the new normality
and transcendence]. Vcheni Zapysky KNEU, (36), 138–144. URL:
https://doi.org/10.33111/vz_kneu.36.24.03.20.138.144.
18. Horban, S., & Bilenko, O. (2025). Business ecosystems in Ukraine: Status and development
prospects. Social Development: Economic and Legal Issues, (4), 15. URL:
https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2025.4.15.
19. Dmytrenko, A. (2025). Didzhytalizatsiia biznes-ekosistem v suchasnii ekonomichnii
paradyhmi v umovakh tsyfrovoi transformatsii ekonomiky [Digitalization of business ecosystems in
the modern economic paradigm under conditions of digital economic transformation]. Ekonomika i
Rehion, 4(99). URL: https://journals.nupp.edu.ua/eir/uk/article/view/4166.
20. Horbanova, V. (2024). Vplyv tsyfrovoi transformatsii biznesu na mekhanizmy
korporatyvnoho upravlinnia [The impact of digital business transformation on corporate governance
mechanisms]. Ukrainskyi Ekonomichnyi Chasopys, (4), 5–10. URL: https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-
8273/2024-4-1.