Current problems of strategic governance in the digital economy

DOI: 10.31673/2415-8089.2021.049904

Abstract

The article studies the theoretical and methodological provisions for identifying the risks of communications enterprises for the further development of the system of strategic management of communications enterprises in the context of the development of the digital economy of Ukraine. The article indicates that the identification of risks of strategic management of telecommunications companies, as well as measures to identify, interpret, personalize responsible persons, select risk assessment criteria and select alternatives are the main factor determining the sustainable development of telecommunications companies in the digital economy.
It was revealed that the problem of identifying the risk of strategic management, choosing the method of assessment and responsibility in the modern management of telecommunications enterprises is very promising for study. In addition, its relevance increases over time. More and more new questions appear for consideration that are of interest to representatives of many sciences and are important for the practical application of telecommunications enterprises in the digital economy of Ukraine.

Keywords: strategic management, risk, risk identification, telecommunications companies, digital economy.

REFERENCES
1. Vasylieva T. A., Lieonov S. V., Kryvych Ya. M. (2015). Ekonomichnyi ryzyk: metody otsinky ta upravlinnia: navch. posibnyk. [Economic risk: methods of assessment and management]. Sumy : DVNZ «UABS NBU».
2. Hrabar N. S. (2019). Informatsiina bezpeka v umovakh stanovlennia hlobalnoho informatsiinoho suspilstva. [Information security in the conditions of formation of the global information society]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok. Retrieved from: http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1461
3. Hudz O. Ye. (2018). Tsyfrova ekonomika: zmina tsinnostei ta oriientyriv upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy [Digital economy: changing values and guidelines of enterprise management]. Ekonomika. Menedzhment. Biznes. vol.2, 4–12.
4. Derzhavna sluzhba spetsialnoho zviazku ta zakhystu informatsii Ukrainy [State Service for Special Communications and Information Protection of Ukraine] Retrieved from: https://cip.gov.ua/ua/news/ukrayina-posila-25-misce-u-nacionalnomu-indeksi-kiberbezpeki-2020?fbclid=IwAR1Lwcho
5. Zelisko I. M., Sosnovska O.O., Khu Suntszie. (2019). Rozvytok informatsiinoho suspilstva yak dominanta innovatsiinoho zrostannia [Development of information society as a dominant of innovative growth]. Ekonomika. Menedzhment. Biznes. Retrieved from: http://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/28940/1/I_Zelisko_O_Sosnovska_HUsynze_EMB_1%2827%29_FITU_DUT.pdf
6. Rishchuk L.I. (2017). Metodychnyi pidkhid do otsinky vnutrishnikh ryzykiv pidpryiemstva. [Methodical approach to assessing the internal risks of the enterprise]. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky. Retrieved from: http://global-national.in.ua/archive/16-2017/90.pdf
7. Fedulova I. V. (2016). Identyfikatsiia ryzykiv yak skladova ryzyk-menedzhmentu [Risk identification as a component of risk management]. Intelekt XXI. vol.4,. 29-45.
8. Shevchuk I.B., Deputat B.Ia., Tarasenko O.Ie. (2019). Tsyfrovizatsiia ta yii vplyv na ekonomiku Ukrainy: perevahy, vyklyky zahrozy y ryzyky [Digitalization and its impact on Ukraine's economy: benefits, threats and risks]. Matematychni metody, modeli ta informatsiini tekhnolohii v ekonomitsi. №47 (2), 173-177.
9. Shliakh do vidnovlennia u 2022: kerivnyky biznesu v Ukraini pro vyklyky ta perspektyvy [The road to recovery in 2022: business leaders in Ukraine on challenges and prospects]. Retrieved from: https://hub.kyivstar.ua/news/shlyah-do-vidnovlennya-u-2022-kerivnyky-biznesu-v-ukrayini-pro-vyklyky-ta-perspektyvy/