INTEGRATED SECURITY SYSTEM OF AN INTELLIGENT CYBERPHYSICAL EMERGENCY MONITORING SYSTEM

DOI: 10.31673/2409-7292.2025.014428

Abstract

The Cybersecurity Strategy of Ukraine provides for the development of methodological approaches to the security of
intelligent technologies for functional support of the segment of safe monitoring of emergencies in the ecosystem of the regions
of Ukraine. The analysis of recent research in the direction of developing the architecture of cyber-physical systems, creating
models of their security and practical implementation of safe cyber-physical systems in the subject areas of the infrastructure of
society was carried out. The aspects of creating an intelligent cyber-physical system for monitoring the parameters of
emergencies in the region's ecosystem based on the universal platform “architecture of an intelligent cyber-physical system - an
integrated security model - a comprehensive security system” were studied. The multi-level architecture of an intelligent cyberphysical system was considered, which enables the selection of parameters of emergencies in the region's ecosystem under the
influence of natural and man-made factors in the space “control - processing - analysis - management” and is the basis for
building an integrated model of its security. The functionality of the intelligent cyber-physical system is deployed at the
technology level: physical space (monitoring sensors - greenhouse gases, radioactive emissions, earthquake detection
parameters; real-time emergency video surveillance systems); communication environment (wireless communication systems -
LoRaWAN, GPS, LTE); cybernetic space (geoinformation system, information resources). Based on the concept of "object -
threat - protection", complex security systems of the intelligent cyber-physical system are proposed under the influence of targeted and random security threats at the external and internal levels. Aspects of the mandated security policy of the intelligent
cyber-physical system are analyzed according to the main security profile - confidentiality.
Keywords: intellectualization, emergencies, ecosystem of the region, monitoring, cybersecurity, intelligent cyberphysical system, complex security systems, mandated security policy.

References
1.Стратегія кібербезпеки України. – [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://zakon.rada.
gov.ua/laws/show/447/2021#n12.
2.Kozhedub, Y.V., Kramska, Y.A., & Gyrda, V.A. (2020). Analysis of human factor influence on cyber-physical
system. Information Technology and Security, 8(1), 102-115.
3.Meytus, V., Morozova, G., Taran, L., Kozlova, V., & Maidaniuk, N. (2019). Cyber-physical systems as a basis for
intellectualization of smart enterprises. Control Systems and Computers, 4(282), 14-26.
4.Mutua, E. (2024). Cyber-Physical Systems and Their Role in Industry 4.0. Journal of Technology and Systems,
6(5), 57-69. doi: 10.47941/jts.2149.
5.Ahmad, Z., Islam, U., & Riaz, S. (2024). Complexity Analysis of Industrial Scale Cyber Physical Systems. In 2024
IEEE 7th International Conference on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS) (pp. 1-6). St. Louis, MO: IEEE.
6.Pogasiy, S.S. (2022). Models and methods of information protection in cyber-physical systems. Information
Security, 28(2), 67-79.
7.Шологон О.З. (2015). Безпека у кіберфізичних системах. Кіберфізичні системи досягнення та виклики:
матеріали першого Наукового семінару (с. 132-137). Львів: Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”:
НВФ “Українські технології”.
8.Furrer, F.J. (2023). Safe and secure system architectures for cyber-physical systems. Informatik Spektrum, 46, 96–
103. doi: 10.1007/s00287-023-01533-z.
9.Бобало Ю.Я., Дудикевич В.Б., & Микитин Г.В. (2020). Стратегічна безпека системи “об’єкт – інформаційна
технологія”. Львів: Видавництво НУ “Львівська політехніка”.
10.Yang, T., Liu, Y., & Li, W. (2022). Attack and defence methods in cyber-physical power system. IET Energy
Systems Integration, 4(2), 159-170.
11.Mittal, S., Tolk, A., Haque, M.A., Shetty, S., & Krishnappa, B. (2019). Cyber-physical system resilience. In S.
Mittal & A. Tolk (Eds.), Complexity Challenges in Cyber-Physical Systems (pp. 301-337). John Wiley & Sons.
12.Nakirya, J.B. (2024). Cyber-Physical Systems: Integrating Computing with Physical Processes. Research Output
Journal of Engineering and Scientific Research, 3(2), 49-52.
13.Yu, Z., Gao, H., Cong, X., Wu, N., & Song, H.H. (2023). A survey on cyber–physical systems security. IEEE
Internet of Things Journal, 10(24), 21670-21686.
14.Regulations on the interaction of subjects of monitoring, surveillance, laboratory control and forecasting of
emergencies. (2018). Retrieved from https://dsns.gov.ua/upload/1/2/6/3/6/2018-2-24-reglament-monatoring.odt?__cf_
chl_tk=uRf577YiOBdD_eQFmtxeelDKT_B_CpY.32UWrSL5jms-1730019053-1.0.1.1-
4Vno.OAFXRREH35LgX87pC5lrbKs4SH_cH83ncCtsPI.
15.Zatserkovnyi, V.I., Burachek, V.G., Zheleznyak, O.O., & Tereshchenko, A.O. (2014). Geoinformation systems and
databases: monograph. Nizhyn: Nizhyn State University named after M. Gogolya.