GAME INDICES IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS: CYBER RESILIENCE, CYBER POWER AND CYBERSECURITY

DOI: 10.31673/2409-7292.2025.016955

  • Гайдук О. В. (Gaiduk O. V.) State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine.
  • Звєрєв В, П. (Zverev V. P.) State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Abstract

An approach to assessing the effectiveness of international cybersecurity strategies is proposed, based on the synthesis
of game theory and quantitative analysis of indicators of cooperation between states in cyberspace. The authors analyze the
strategic decisions of countries as rational players choosing between defensive and offensive strategies in cyberspace, taking
into account the possibilities of cooperation and conflict. An analysis of the main existing cybersecurity indices, such as the
Global Cybersecurity Index (GCI), the National Cyber Security Index (NCSI) and others, which assess the cyber capabilities of
states at different levels, is conducted. The development of three conditional game indices is presented: cybersecurity, cyber
resilience and cyber power, which allow assessing the level of security, resilience and offensive potential of states, respectively.
The importance of developing more flexible and accurate methods for assessing cyber capabilities that would take into account
international interactions and the political context is also emphasized. The assessment is based on a matrix of the level of
cooperation in cyberspace, which reflects the level of mutual trust and willingness to exchange data and technologies. The
methodology is demonstrated on the example of simulated data from five countries, for which the aforementioned indices were
calculated based on model interaction matrices. The results show that more intensive and evenly distributed cooperation
increases both the overall level of security and the state's resistance to attacks, and high cyberpower correlates with leadership
in global cyberspace. The proposed approach can be used for operational monitoring, analysis of weak links in international
cooperation, and scenario modeling in conditions of dynamically changing threats. The article seeks to contribute to improving
methodological approaches to cyber diplomacy, assessing the cyber potential of states, using game theory tools to understand
complex interstate interactions in the field of cybersecurity and developing more effective strategies for international
cooperation. The results of the study are of interest to cyber diplomats, cybersecurity professionals, government agencies, think
tanks, and international organizations.
Keywords: cybersecurity, game theory, cyber threats, cyber resilience, cyber power, modeling, cyber-attacks,
international communications, game indices, cyber diplomacy.

References
1. О. Корченко, Є. Іванченко, О. Бакалинський, Д. Мялковський, Д. Зубков, Метод оцінювання рівня
підвищення стану кіберзахисту об’єктів критичної інфраструктури держави. Наукоємні технології 61 (1), 3-20.
2. О. Гайдук. Кібердипломатія як парадигма нового підходу до міжнародних відносин: досвід країн світу,
науково-академічні практики та кібербезпека міжнародних комунікацій. Монографія "Стратегічні комунікації в
умовах війни: погляд від волонтера до науковця". Національна Академія Служби Безпеки України, Київ, 2024.
3. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press,
1944.
4. Osborne, M. J. An Introduction to Game Theory. Oxford University Press, 2003.
5. Basar, T., & Olsder, G. J. Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory. SIAM, 1999.
6. Tambe M., Security and Game Theory: Algorithms, Deployed Systems, Lessons Learned. Cambridge
University Press, 2011.
7. Charles A. Holt and Alvin E. Roth, The Nash equilibrium: A perspective Department of Economics, University
of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4182; Department of Economics and Harvard Business School, Harvard
University, Cambridge, MA 02138 January 28, 2004.
8. Fiorenzo Mornati, Pareto optimality in the work of pareto. Revue européenne des sciences sociales T. 51, No.
2, Numéro spécial du cinquantenaire: autour de pareto (2013), pp. 65-82 (18 pages).
9. Nisarg Shah, Game Theory : Zero-Sum Games, The Minimax Theorem https://www.cs.toronto.edu
/~nisarg/teaching/304f17/slides/CSC304-L5.pdf https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~nisarg/teaching/304f19/slides/304f19-
L6.pdf
10. Kaifu Zhang, Timothy Van, Theorem of the Maximin and Applications to Bayesian Zero-Sum Games, Feb
2010 Economics and Political Sciences; Centre for Economic Policy Research.
11. Amadi Emmanuuel Chukwudi, Eze Udoka, Ikerionwu Charles. Game Theory Basics and Its Application in
Cyber Security. Advances in Wireless Communications and Networks. Vol. 3, No. 4, 2017, pp. 45-49. doi:
10.11648/j.awcn.20170304.13
12. Chukwudi, Amadi & Eze, Udoka & Ikerionwu, Charles. (2017). Game Theory Basics and Its Application in
Cyber Security. Advances in Wireless Communications and Networks. 3. 45-49.
13. Індекс кібервразливості Cyber Exposure Index – Cyber Exposure Development Environment
14. Рейтинг безпеки Bitsight Bitsight Cyber Security Ratings | Bitsight
15. Худинцев, Микола & Жилін, Артем & Davydiuk, Andrii. (2021). Світові індекси кібербезпеки: огляд та
методики формування (Глобальний звіт / Каталог). Інститут проблем моделювання в енергетиці ім. Г.Є. Пухова
НАН України ISBN: 978-966-136-887-2.
16. Національний індекс кібербезпеки. Академія електронного урядування (eGA)
https://ega.ee/project/national-cyber-security-index/
17. Глобальний індекс кібербезпеки (GCI) Міжнародного союзу електрозв'язку https://www.itu.int/en/ITUD/Cybersecurity/Pages/global-cybersecurity-index.aspx
18. Інструмент оцінки національних стратегій кібербезпеки ENISA https://www.enisa.europa.eu/
tools/national-cybersecurity-strategies-evaluation-tool
19. Cyber Readiness Index (CRI) Potomac Institute for Policy Studies
https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/cyber-readiness-index-20
20. Cybersecurity Capacity Maturity Model for Nations Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre
https://gcscc.ox.ac.uk/the-cmm
21. Voo, Julia, Irfan Hemani, Simon Jones, Winnona DeSombre, Dan Cassidy and Anina Schwarzenbach.
“National Cyber Power Index 2020.” September 2020 https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/national-cyber-powerindex-2020
22. Національний індекс кіберпотужності (NCPI) 2022 https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/nationalcyber-power-index-2022
23. Cam Sivesind, Cyber Powers: Ranking the Top 30 Nations by Capabilities, Intent Sep 27, 2022.
24. 10 Guards, 30 наймогутніших кібердержав світу https://10guards.com/ua/blog/2022/10/10/the-worlds-30-
cyber-superpowers/
25. Індекс кібер можливостей та національної потужності – Cyber Capabilities and National Power (CCNP),
https://www.iiss.org/research-paper/2023/09/cyber-capabilities-national-power-volume-2/
26. Çifci, Hasan, Comparison of National-Level Cybersecurity and Cyber Power Indices: A Conceptual
Framework. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2159915/v1, 2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364451490_Comparison_
of_National-Level_Cybersecurity_and_Cyber_Power_Indices_A_Conceptual_Framework
27. Axelrod, R. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, 1984.
28. Eric Rasmusen's book, Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. First Edition: 1989, 344 pp.,
ISBN: 0-631- 15709-3. Second edition: 1994, 478 pp., ISBN: 1-55786- 502- 7. Third Edition, ISBN: 0631215573, 2001.
Fourth Edition, 2006, ISBN:1405136669.
29. Lin, H. S., & Zegart, A. B. (Eds.) Bytes, Bombs, and Spies: The Strategic Dimensions of Offensive Cyber
Operations. Brookings Institution Press, 2019.
30. Kamhoua, C. A., Kwiat, K., & Hurley, P. (Eds.) Game Theory and Machine Learning for Cyber Security. CRC
Press, 2020.

Section
Articles